Wednesday, June 23, 2021

"The Journey" - Beliefs and Truths

 I hope the posts I have written helps someone think about things differently and to get a different picture of their world-view. If you are reading this post, please be aware of the previous posts which discuss aspects of this topic that help build up to this point in the discussion.

In this post, I will discuss different beliefs and ideas about truths. The reason why this is important is because everything one believes about their ideas, the world, etc. is based on beliefs. As much as people would like to think there are absolute truths, those truths are actually beliefs. It cannot be absolute truths because you cannot know everything when you are limited in the types of experiences you can have. No one has gone near a black hole. Most in our time have never even left our planetary space. The only experience that people talk about are human experiences, and so all "truths" are based on those limited experiences.

What makes someone believable to an individual while others are considered liars, quacks, misinformed, or just plain wrong? What makes one person's perspective clear and reasonable? Is it the evidence they provide? Is it their tone or delivery? How does one judge information for its "correctness" when you're mostly told the evidence as fact? You have no way of proving anything someone else says, unless you had the exact same personal experience.

In my perspective, people already have an opinion or viewpoint on a topic, and they seek out those with similar opinion or viewpoint. Some may have strong beliefs and those beliefs are validated by others, or they had a feeling or maybe doubt about something, and a book or speech or presentation provided that "Aha!" moment at the right time. In either case, it always starts with your own perspective. It doesn't have to be a strong belief in something. It can be a doubt about something that you may have pushed aside or denied for whatever reason. The point here is that when some information is brought into your awareness, it is for a reason but it is also your choice in how you respond to the information. This response alone, if you pay attention, can show you what your beliefs are.

When it comes to "truth", it is simply a tool to convince oneself of a belief. It can be any belief such as math or science or religion or even what you perceive. What one experiences in "life" is the only truth, which is that "life" is about experiences. Anything else is simply intellectualizing the experience. For example, Newton experienced the effect of "gravity", but he intellectualized the concept of "gravity" through that experience. The truth of the matter isn't the laws or mathematical proof of the law. It is the experience of observing behavior. No logical scientist tries to define human behavior in terms of mathematical laws, and yet it is accepted by many scientists that mathematical laws are absolute when it comes to material behaviors.

Why do people believe that this 3D experience is constant, and at the same time unstable? What I mean by unstable is that physicists believe the universe tends towards chaos (entropy or destruction). How can a system tend towards destruction and at the same time be constant, or more correctly, regenerative (hence the life/death cycle)? How can something by "law", must become broken, if it can become whole first (it must first be created, which is order)? This is because, the idea of entropy is incorrect. It is based on the belief that the universe is unconscious and dead. The universe is not moving towards destruction or chaos. It is merely behaving as all conscious things do: it is always changing. You may see destruction locally, but you will not see destruction as a whole. That is because the whole is itself stable and constant as far as existence goes. Many believe different ideas about the physical world because they convince themselves of their understanding through what they consider "proof".

What does it mean to have "proof"? If I show you 1+1 = 2, why does this analogy represent proof? It is because "proof" is simply another word for "logical". The existence of the idea that there must be a way to explain a subjective experience is because many focus on logic to explain or understand their experience. They do not consider their own intuitive understanding because it cannot be explained to another. This need to convince others is a type of ego, one that requires recognition and many times comfort from their fears. If one can convince the many of their idea, it creates a sense of satisfaction and comfort in knowing they were right and is among many others who believe the same thing.

This brings up the point that there is no such thing as "right". Or perhaps it's more correct to say that all individual perspectives are "right". Those who do not accept this is doing so based on the belief that there is only one right way to view everything in the world. This belief comes from the assumption that the universe is real (it is), external (it isn't), and independent from each individual perspective (it is and isn't). They believe that even without them being in the universe, the universe would still exist. The problem of seeing the universe from only their perspective makes this type of logical thinking seem correct. In a sense, this is true, but not because it is independent from them. Rather, it is because everything that exists is also a perspective. From each other perspective, they would also see the universe from their point of view, and thus it would exist. If there was nothing left in the universe to be a perspective, then there would no longer be a universe as nothing would perceive it. Which brings up my next point.

As much as we as humans like to think that we are the apex of creation, we are not so different than anything else in the universe. We are simply a larger bundle of bits of consciousness than a plant or a stone (consider that the human body is composed of base molecules organized into different organs). It isn't about the size of the object. It is about the configuration of conscious awareness. A rock or molecule is not consciously behaving like a human would. Likewise, the universe, with its uncountable number of galaxies, behave like a galaxy, containing, revolving, moving, using "forces" such as "gravity". Physics talks about fundamental forces of nature, but I call them the consciousness of the universe behaving (what we perceive) as the universe by converting energy, no different than a person who acts out their will. It is focused on the experience of being a rock or a molecule or a galaxy, thus, it can behave like a rock or molecule or galaxy. Without this focused consciousness, you would not see a rock since it wouldn't act like a rock. In other words, everything that you can see in this 3D world is due to the unseen consciousness manifesting and behaving as a 3D thing. This is how a concept becomes materialized in 3D. It is forming the symbol of the concept. This then implies that physical and spiritual are both the same thing in different forms. There is no need to "be spiritual" while physical since you must be both already.

This is also why rules can exist. Rules can only exist because something conscious defined them and follows them. A rule alone cannot be experienced unless something obeys the rule, which then makes the rule observable. Many scientists believe in mathematics as being absolute because it is repeatable and consistent. It is not seen as being "subjective" so it appears to be outside of individual influence to manipulate. However, math itself is a well-defined set of rules. Conceptually, it defines how rules behave using symbols including numbers, constants, variables, and operators. If math is also simply rules, then everything defined by mathematics is exemplifying consciousness underneath the observable surface. Everything being explored in 3D reality is merely the observable end result of unseen behaviors.

By "behavior", I'm referring to what can be observed as actions from making choices. "Living" things have behavior because the thing that appears "alive" is making choices. It may or may not be aware of these choices because it depends on which level of consciousness you are referring to. As I mentioned, all things in 3D has an underlying non-3D aspect. They are not 2 things, but rather 2 ways to describe the same thing. The non-3D consciousness is what does the acting. The 3D consciousness is what does the observing and experiencing. These 2 types of consciousness together create experience through behavior. It could be a rock, it could be a plant, it could be an animate creature including humans. As this applies to the small, it also applies to the large such as the galaxy which is the cumulative composition of all of the smaller bundles of consciousness. It doesn't even have to be physical (meaning a shape that is observable using physical senses). Where this confuses people is using their own sense of time to define behavior. Some behaviors span much larger amounts of time for change to be observed, but time as experienced in 3D is an illusion. It is dependent on the scale of experience.

A galaxy will span many billions of years, while a planet will experience much less number of years. Living creatures vary in the amount of years of experience, but in terms of observing change, it can be very short time periods. For example, we experience time as rapid successions of "moments". This can be observed as a smooth transition from one point in space to another. This slicing of time can be represented as slices of physical reality configurations (I described this as patterns of energy). When you experience time, you are experiencing transitioning between one slice of reality to another. But this observation of the movement of time is an aspect of the physical senses. Another sense that is not physical is the experience of change. Everything experiences change, and that is the true experience of time. It is not necessarily a linear experience. You can experience yourself as a young child through memory. You did not "go back in time" physically, but you did so experientially through your inner senses. That is how memory recall works, you are literally re-creating the moment non-physically of a given experience. This is also why memory recall can be inherently error prone. Because you are re-creating the moment from the physical perspective, and you may not be "remembering" it accurately.

Because we are experiencing linear time while in this physical reality, and our focus is limited (meaning we cannot absorb all the information occurring in a given moment), we are only able to understand our experience in 3D life in a specific way. We can only hold so much information at a given moment, and this varies with each individual, so we tend to forget certain important contextual information.

For example, many times people ask "why does evil exist?", forgetting that evil is a description of something opposite the subjective idea of good. Without one, the other would not exist. Another reason is that everything has a purpose in order to be able to experience some situation. If a situation requires evil in order to give a person the ability to make a choice in such a situation, then of course, evil must exist. It is the subjective preference, the assumption of isolation, and fear of the unknown that creates these judgment definitions. This is not to say the idea of evil is good, but that it is no different than good. They both exist because together they allow for certain kinds of experiences for the development of self-awareness and self-creation.

The real question shouldn't be why does this or that exist, but how does this or that help me be more of me? How can I become what I want to be in any given situation or experience? That is why linear time exists. It is to force you to make choices. If you could redo something at any time, then there would be no true experience due to the lack of consequence. It would be no different than being non-physical, already experiencing timeless simultaneousness. This is the difference between experiencing self-awareness in non-3D vs 3D.

Physical reality has rules defined in order to allow specific types of experiences to exist. Within this framework, we come into existence in order to experience what it is like. From the experiences, you change who you are. Why is it important to change who you are if you are already everything? Think about it this way. If there was no change, then the only possibilities available is what you have already experienced. You could not create new experiences without change. As "everything", in order to be "everything", you must experience BEING everything. And that requires change from one state to another, which is how "everything" can exist because change is creating every "thing". This change occurs because of experience. It cannot happen just by thought because you cannot know what you do not know. As much as the One Creator is "everything", it will always be changing because that is what it means to be alive. To be dead is to be static and unchanging.

How you experience life and how you define yourself in life is dependent on the beliefs you live by, and how you choose to respond to your life experiences based on those beliefs. You live in a reality of fixed time intervals, which slows down the experience so that you can absorb the changes and reflect on those changes to decide your next set of choices. Life in this reality is all about choices because it is the purpose for having free-will, which leads to change. Many may argue that free-will is an illusion, but that is because they define reality from the surface layer of observation. Behind it all, there is a flow of consciousness that allows for reality to exist and thus there is a reason for its existence. From the one side of the surface, you are living an isolated and limited life. That life will alter and change the entire universe, even if you do not see your part in it. But from the other side of the surface, you see the whole picture and your part in it. The question is, can you see the same big picture while living in limitation or can you only see the surface and react to the experiences in life without consciously using your free-will?

Sunday, June 6, 2021

"The Journey" - Awareness of self, connection to everything

In my previous post on "The Past", I brought up our connection to the concept of "extra-terrestrials". This term is a misnomer. It assumes that these beings, some who reside on this planet, is somehow not connected to this planet. There are many connections to beings outside of our awareness that help us live our daily lives, but most are unaware of this fact. It is often thought of as feelings or thoughts or images that come to mind, but many have seen their presence, either through seeing UFOs or in dreams. It has also been called intuition, inspiration, a knowing, etc. All of these are connections to the idea of "self". I will discuss this concept of "self" and our connections to the Universe.

"Who am I?"

When you think about yourself, most people assume a singular thing called "I". That "I" represents the waking conscious awareness of "self". From this perspective, everything else appears to be disconnected from "self", and thus is called "other". This perspective is the cause for many misunderstandings in this reality. Much of the understanding about cause and effect is incorrect because the explanations are using the "effect" to explain another "effect" without seeing the cause. This is true for the scientific perspective as well as the non-scientific (everyday individuals, religious or not).

This assumption and unconscious bias to see things through separation creates a mystery about the life experiences. It appears to most people that there are random and "chaotic" events in the universe. It seems like life is "unfair" or "harsh" or "evil". So many different words used to describe their life in a negative perspective because it does not meet their expectations. All of this stems from the belief in separation. What does "separation" mean as opposed to "connected"?

You can see the concept of "separation" and "connection" at different levels of observation. From one perspective, you see an object in space relative to you. That separation by the perceived space, as well as the inability to consciously cause that object to be manipulated without your physically acting upon the object, is what creates the belief in physical separation. Your body feels connected because your mental intent causes your body to act. These types of behavior create the high level perception of separation or connection.

From another perspective, you may see your action being connected to another action. If I take a step, I may have stepped on an insect, or shifted the dirt under the feed. You may have worn down your shoes a little or you may have caused micro-fractions within your bones. The actions you take show a connection to a reaction elsewhere. Likewise, you sneezing may not be considered as the cause of a shift in the air, which then affected some other area of the atmosphere to be different. These types of activity are perceived as separate because you do not see a direct correlation of your actions to another effect.

From yet another perspective, you may see your connection to your children and to your parents and the family units. But you may see separation between yourself and a stranger or someone long past dead or yet to be born. The relationships you create are defined by words such as parent, child, family, friend, lover, stranger, etc. All of these words convey the feeling of connection or separation.

Why is this idea of connection and separation important to understanding who you are? Because you are not alone in this world, nor are you a single source of thought. Everyone and everything is here to allow you to experience the life you are supposed to experience. You are given the opportunities to choose how you will define yourself by the interactions and connections with everything around you. But if you do not believe there are connections, and that separations exist, then you will look at your life situation as something outside of your control. It can be heaven through God's blessing or luck, or hell from God's injustice/wrath or someone else's fault, depending on how you experience your life. Separation means you have something that you believe is not in your control that can be blamed as the cause of your dissatisfaction with yourself or your experience.

The belief in separation is so strong, most people do not think twice about this idea. Typically, the concept of being connected and connections are left at the "New Age" altar of marriage. It is like the Christian who accepts Jesus into their hearts, but lives the secular life. It is a belief in words, but not in actions. Because of this, people live their life as if they are in danger of extinction. Fear of things in their world dictate their lives. Rules are created to mitigate these unforeseen and unexpected events in their lives, whether through politics or religion or rituals (taking pills, exercise, avoiding certain things). Life becomes a survival game and that dictates who they are. This, again, is not meant to be a criticism, but rather a pointed visualization of the current state of most people's inner being.

Without being aware of the connections with their world (and I mean "their" because each individual perspective is creating their own representation of the world), they feel isolated, alone, and helpless. The purpose of enlightenment isn't to become spiritual gurus, but instead to recognize that it is what's inside that is creating these perspectives about their world, and thus learn to expand their beliefs. If someone believes the world is a real phenomenon apart from their own participation, then their lives will appear to validate this belief and their rationalization of experience will justify their beliefs.

However, if one sees the connection between their inner being and the outer experience, they begin to see how their own thoughts and feelings manifest in their world. This is what it means to "know yourself". It is also the awareness through connections that you begin to see how everything in the world that is experienced and can be experienced tie into the reality of existence.

Density and dimensions

I wrote about my definition of density, how it relates to the experience within physical reality as the amount of conscious awareness that is available.

Dimensions are the way a perspective sees the connections within a reality. We in the 3rd density are experiencing self-awareness through consciousness, and we are in the 3rd dimension because we experience a certain way to see things. As we expand our awareness of the connections we have with the rest of the Universe, we can expand our awareness of other dimensions.

A dimension in physical spatial terms is considered planes of information. 3-D is 3 dimensional planes that represent 3 perpendicular axis in visual space. This is the geometric definition of dimension and it is a good way to visualize spacial relationships. In the same way, a non-spatial dimension represents the relationships between different manifestations of energy or frequencies. They are not necessarily in spatial dimensions (i.e. planes, although the manifestation can be in 3-D space). Instead, it is represented by different frequency of energy. A simple way to express this is to realize that we in 3-D only experience a specific range of the electromagnetic spectrum. Visible light is one range, audible frequencies is another. They are examples of a specific dimension that we can experience through our physical senses.

"Higher" or "lower" dimensions are simply different frequencies that one may or may not be attuned to in their sensitivity. As you alter your vibratory frequency, you shift the dimensional awareness. One common practice to alter your dimensional attunement is to sleep. Your consciousness alters through different frequencies (alpha, beta, gamma, delta). They are how one "travels" through dimensions. Another is through meditation, hypnosis, concentrated focus, drugs, and other mind-altering methods.

The relationship of the human perception and dimensions is that all dimensions exist simultaneously, including spatial dimensions. This goes back to my first point above, which is that all is connected. "Connected" does not only mean one thing is related to another. It also means that one thing IS another. It is by the frequency of focus that one observes that one thing as this OR that. It is also why your frequency of perception defines your ability to see the Universe in a particular way. This "connection" occurs because there is only One Creator, the source of energy that is Existence. This energy is represented in different ways depending on the frequency, which is the dimension of perception.

This means that the notion of "physical" and "spiritual" is separation by language, not by reality. All physical things are perceptions of spiritual things, and all spiritual things manifest as physical representations. The mere fact that things appear is to allow the understanding of relationships and to use that concept of relationships to create experiences. Through these experiences of relationships, you learn through the densities of existence towards understanding the Whole.

Each layer of density create the appearance of separation, but one is not separate from the other. You cannot be a 3rd density being without having the physical form of the 2nd density being or the 1st density raw materials. The 4th and higher density beings are the source of your thoughts, intuitions, and imaginations. They are your "spirit" guides, your "spirit" family, your "higher self", "extra-terrestrial". The ideas of angels and gods are tied to these incarnations in the higher densities, and all these densities combined is manifested as "you". It is the connection through dimensions that lets you perceive and interact with these densities through your vibratory frequency.

In the next post, I will discuss certain topics related to current beliefs.

Friday, June 4, 2021

"The Journey" - The Past

The information I will share today will be considered pure speculation for many because there is no way any of this can be proven. The basis for this post is based on what I have heard from other researchers and enthusiasts, information from "channeled" sources, but also my own intuition. Just like anything else that is not based on physical evidence, each listener will have to feel their way through this to see if it is right for you.

Also, many times, I will re-read my posts and add missing information, fix mistakes, or clarify points. That is because trying to explain a concept requires details that provide context or definitions. Without this, I may give the wrong impression. Words, definitions, unconscious bias through social norms all play into how something written is interpreted and I try to keep that in mind when explaining my perspective. That's why I also have to read what I write again and again, to proof the information. I hope what I am sharing is clear enough.

The Past

Growing up religious, the commonly taught belief is that human existence is only 5-6000 years old. Before this, there was no human existence. At the time, I never really questioned this, nor thought much about it. In school, we were taught about cave men, neanderthals, and homo-sapiens. Except for the dinosaurs and cave men, I assumed that 6000 years for human existence sounded good. Until I learned more about the Earth's age and then the universe's estimated age. Even if no one really knew how old the universe was, I realized that 6000 years is not a long time.

The other belief that was implied was that only humans existed in the universe. This was believed by the religious and non-religious alike. Many of the people I grew up with did not believe in life outside of Earth. The logic being that if non-terrestrial beings existed, they would have shown themselves by now. This is the same argument that atheists use to deny the existence of the religious "God". However, once I found out how many stars (and thus planets) have been estimated from astrological observations, I could not justify the notion that humans were the only sentient beings in the Universe. Just as I could not logically explain how something came from nothing, I could not justify the belief that we are the only intelligent life in the universe.

Many have begun questioning these old religious and skeptical ideas, but many still hold on to the past beliefs. Once I started to watch programs showing archaeological sites, such as Baalbek or even the great pyramids and other megalithic sites, some of the readings I've done made more sense. There was no way our relatively old ancestors could create such sites and structures given the academic descriptions of civilizations back then. If our ancestors of the past 5-6000 years only had primitive tools and skills, it is as believable that they created the pyramids as it is to believe that humans are dogs. The size, weight, and skill required to cut such hard and massive stones with such precision, geometry, and positioning could not have been done without mathematical skill, advanced tools, and some means to transport and position such impossibly large stone.

Only the most diehard skeptic would try to argue that it is possible using flint and wood to do these things, without ever having to demonstrate such illogical explanations.

Assume that the academic explanations about these sites are wrong. How could they have been created?

It has been said many times, that the locations and structures of pyramids and certain megalithic structures are very much aligned with astrological bodies. The star clusters known as Orion, Sirius, and Pleiades are well known to astrologers. Many sites have been shown to align to these constellations. How did ancient civilizations know about such things? We have to go back to those old stories and what we consider myths today to find some answers. There are many writings from philosophers and intellectuals of the ancient past that also provides information about the past.

One of these tales that everyone is familiar with is the tale of Zeus and the Greek gods. There are many tales about these gods, with detailed descriptions of each being. How did the ancient Greek come to know such details? If you learn about other gods of other regions, you will find many correlations between the stories of their gods and the Greek gods. I'm not going to go into detail about these in this blog because that is not my goal. I bring this up to pique your interest. It would also take much time to write and I want to keep these posts relatively short to get through as much information as I can.

The gods of old

What if the stories of gods, spoken about in almost every culture around the globe, each having different names but similar qualities, are actually true? Why would they be considered gods? The main reason anyone on Earth would consider them gods is because the people at the time did not have the knowledge and understanding of the universe. So if something came down from the sky, it would look like a heavenly being coming down to the people. In fact, any imagery of beings rising or lowering from the sky would only make sense if the beings were physical. They could not be considered gods then because they had physical form. And yet, if these beings were highly advanced, intelligent, and capable of demonstrating powers that the natives could not explain or believe, they would surely be looked upon as gods.

However, with the Earth being millions, if not billions, of years old, how could earthly civilization only be 6000 years old? And if these heavenly beings are actually extra-terrestrial beings visiting Earth, then why couldn't they have visited even earlier? Given that the visitors knew of Earth itself means there is a connection to them with this planet.

If the older civilizations lived with certain beliefs, such as religious ideas, how did they get those beliefs if not from some other source? Perhaps directly from these non-terrestrial visitors? Perhaps from an older tale? Or perhaps both? If earthly civilization extended beyond the assumed 6000 years, then it makes sense that the tales are of a different era. Visitations could have been done during this current epoch, or perhaps a previous epoch. If one believes in the stories of the bible, then the great flood could have been a dividing line between the previous epoch and the current one.

An epoch is a period of time that is distinct due to major changes. For example, the ice age brought about a new epoch because the majority of the previous inhabitants on the planet would have died out. Same would have happened if the major flood event was as catastrophic as described. In fact, many of the major civilizations have stories about a great flood, as well as geological evidence. The combination of the geological evidence, anecdotes of different cultures and legends, as the recent archeological finds all point of an ancient civilization before the current human presence.

It's not hard to believe that there have been civilizations, including advanced technologies, that could have come and gone on this planet, if our own current civilization can advance from the agricultural era to the modern era in only 200-300 years. If the Earth is a billion years, 300 years is a blip on the calendar. Why would anyone think life did not exist before our history, given that fossils have been found from millions of years? Often times, people find artifacts and point to them as being relatively simple and primitive, but in the recent decades, some very unexplainable artifacts have been found that defy this common belief that only the current civilization is modern or advanced.

Where did humans come from?

The question of origin is hotly debated. The 2 main sides are the religious and the materialist. Western Christian beliefs describe the human creation story of the bible. The materialist look to Darwin to explain the origin of humans. Were we created by "God" or were we evolved from apes?

My 3rd perspective says both is true. How? If you believe that extra-terrestrial beings can exist, then within the past epochs on the Earth, why would it be unbelievable that more advanced beings did not visit and seed the planet? What if they came and genetically altered existing animal species to become the human animal? If neanderthals were more animalistic, wouldn't it make sense that they may be the first generation of genetic manipulation from another species? It would also explain why the missing link is not found.

The 3rd perspective says that humans are genetic manipulation of another animal species in order to help advance the 3rd density being. These "gods of old" are the extra-terrestrial beings, but from the perspective of the 7 densities, they are simply beings of a higher density. Some beings that are in the 4th or 5th density (they have physical form in this reality and come from other star systems) helped evolve the 2nd density beings towards the 3rd density. Even now, these same beings are helping to evolve the human 3rd density beings towards the 4th density. What is the purpose for this? Why would they want to do this?

Before I can answer that question, it must be explained that even though the human form may have evolved from being genetically altered, it does not mean we as consciousness are the product of extra-terrestrial beings. Everything is the One Creator. Humans as a 3rd density being is simply the manifestation of the non-physical consciousness evolved from the 2nd density consciousness. As the 2nd density consciousness, having enough experience to become more self-aware, is now at its stage of awareness to become a 3rd density physical being. The 4th and 5th density beings, because all densities exist simultaneously, helped provide a physical vehicle for the 3rd density consciousness with the participation of the 3rd density consciousness. Just because consciousness is not expressed in physical form does not mean it doesn't exist.

As I described in my post about densities, we are in all densities, experiencing this reality. Each density builds upon each other and assist each other towards remembering our true nature as the One Creator. The physical manifestation of each density of consciousness exists in different space and time within the Universe, so it should not come as a surprise that your other portions in other densities are not of the same planet. You have other lives living on the Earth as aspects of the 3rd density, but you also have 4th, 5th, 6th, and even 7th density beings all working "behind the scenes" now to assist in your evolution of consciousness.

Many people think of extra-terrestrial beings as separate from themselves, just as they do other humans, animals, minerals, Earth, etc. This perspective that they are separate from everything else creates the fear of extra-terrestrials, just as they fear the idea of ghosts and demons. They create the conspiracy theories about abduction without free-will, human experimentation, conquest, deception, etc. In fact, many of the stories about demons and devils are based on the experience of interacting with certain extra-terrestrial and terrestrial beings of higher density and/or dimension (not being within our visible spectrum). In this Octave of 7 densities, there is a choice of polarity within the lower densities.

All beings at the lower densities in this reality chooses to "serve itself" or "serve others". This is the religious idea of loving others, or choosing "evil". "Evil" in this case is judged as the acts of serving self (manipulating, controlling, dominating). Many of the religious figures that have been written about, including Jesus, came to demonstrate their non-physical heritage, and to teach the ways of "service to others". But it was done without judgment against "service to self" because as I mentioned, all consciousness will evolve to understand the Oneness of everything and polarity will not be necessary at that point. While we are in the 3rd density, we are always choosing which path we will follow.

Be who you want to be

This idea of polarity is stated as "create yourself". It is also written to "know yourself". In order to do this, you will experience life in multiple ways through multiple lives in order to experience yourself. This is the path of conscious evolution. The extra-terrestrial beings that helped form this 3rd density form is a part of each of us. We all have connections to our own extra-terrestrial beings that helps us evolve our consciousness. It may be towards the positive polarity. It may be towards the negative polarity. Without both, we would not have the ability to choose, since there would be nothing to distinguish one choice from another.

From this perspective, it's not hard to see why the idea of extra-terrestrials having a connection to this planet isn't far-fetched. The only reason why it would be difficult to accept is due to fear of their assumed intent. Fear is typically reacted to with rejection, denial, or hiding. If one makes the scary thing go away, then there's nothing to fear. But that is one of the purpose for me writing these posts. It is to help connect to your inner knowing and to bring out the fears so that you can face them with some understanding. The light always shines on the darkness, and the light is information. The darkness is the unknown. It's OK to be skeptical, but it's better to be skeptical and curious. But if you are dead-set on staying with your own beliefs, that is you creating yourself through that choice and there is nothing wrong with that choice. I am not trying to argue that my perspective is better than another.

In my next post, I'll discuss our multi-dimensional nature and the connections to other densities.